THE COMING 2012 COLLAPSE
WHAT THEY REALLY MEAN
IS ABORTION MURDER IN GOD’S EYES?
Yes, it is. This debate is one that makes me scratch my head because the debate somehow is turned into “women’s rights”. I don’t know how this falls under women’s rights being that there is another being involved. One of the great things about women is that they see the better side of things naturally. How does the unborn all of a sudden simply become a fetus in their eyes? I’m generalizing of course. I guess even that term presents its problems since all one would have to do is ask “what is it a fetus of?” Everyone was a fetus at some point in their lives. I’m very adamant when it comes to the plight of women, but abortion isn’t a woman’s right in my eyes. If you could ask that fetus if it wants to be killed and it was able to respond, do you think it would say “yes”? No matter how you look at it, you are destroying a life.
Another big debate is where life begins. I believe both sides are wrong in the debate. A fertilized egg does nothing. A fertilized egg is simply a fertilized egg. Obviously it is a living thing long before birth, so that is a ludicrous argument. When a fertilized egg attaches itself to the womb is where life begins. That is when the fertilized egg begins to divide. That is when the magic of life begins. It is the liberal’s idea though that allows for babies to be killed after either a botched abortion or shortly after and no punishment is wanted. In Chicago after a baby survived an abortion attempt a doctor decided to put it in the laundry to die. A woman found it and held it as it died. A law was proposed to have it where doctors will have to help the baby live if it survives an abortion attempt. Obama as a state senator voted “no” to that bill. No matter his excuse, and he’s given an ignorant one, he voted no to have a baby that survives an abortion attempt to receive medical attention. Even NARAL had no problem with that bill, which then became a national law. Many times when babies are killed after birth, the punishment given is a slap on the wrist if one is even given. The thought that babies in the womb are simply fetuses allows for these horrible things to go on.
I find it sadly amusing that people portray pro-lifers as extremists for not wanting women to abort their babies. What is more extreme than ending innocent life? What a terrible thing it is to force babies to live. Are you serious? That’s extremist? The greatest proponent for abortion, or what we call “women’s rights” was Margaret Sanger. She is someone liberals and specifically liberal women point towards as being a great woman and advocate for women’s rights. What they won’t tell you, either because they don’t want you to know or they don’t know themselves is that she was a huge advocate of eugenics. She wanted minorities and certain “undesirables” to be forced to be sterilized. She was a racist who hoped abortions would lower the population of the black community and spoke before a KKK rally. It was also her idea to have a few black leaders to speak for the rest of the race to herd them into one mindset like cattle, hence Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton among others. Those racists on the right want black children to live while the hero to the left wanted black children to be aborted, which is why there are so many Planned Parenthood offices in minority communities. As I do with everything I write here, I only use facts. This is the true history of Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood.
Biblically speaking, John the Baptist when he was a baby in the womb lept when he felt the presence of Jesus while he was in the womb as Mary came into the room. Such a beautiful story in the Bible, isn’t it? There is already awareness the babies in the womb have. They sense light and they feel pain. They are just like you and I, except they depend on their mothers to keep them alive. Just because they are vulnerable, it doesn’t mean they don’t have the right to live. I think because they are vulnerable, they should have more protections legally than you or I would have.
I know some will say “what about the health of the mother?”, but that could mean anything. If a woman’s life is truly on the line, then she should still keep the baby. Give the baby a chance at life, just like those mothers had. With proper medical attention, death from childbirth is nearly a forgotten thing. As for any other reason, abortion is evil in the eyes of God. If a woman is raped, abortion is still wrong. The man who raped her deserves to be executed in my opinion, but shouldn’t punish an innocent life for the crime of the rapist. If a girl is molested, it’s the same case. The man should be executed and the baby should not be punished. Women and girls who are raped will receive no more sympathy than by me. Nothing anguishes me more about humanity than people who rape or molest, but it would be a horrible thing to destroy an innocent life. Women who just see their babies as an inconvenience have some problems seeing life for what it is. If a baby is such a burden upon their selfish lives, then give it up for adoption. There are plenty of people waiting to adopt children. Mother Teresa said it best about women who don’t want to raise the babies they carry “give them to me!” Now that was a woman. There are plenty of people out there ready, willing, and able to raise the babies you don’t want. You have no excuse but to let your child live, either with you or somebody else.
Posted in bible, biblical scripture, Blogroll, Christian Philosophy, Christian Philosophy ; Antichrist ; Armageddon : End of, Christian philosophy Antichrist Armageddon End of Days, Christian Philosphy, christianity, election of grace, sin, Uncategorized | Tags: abortion bible wrong, abortion murder, margaret sanger eugenics, margaret sanger kkk, margaret sanger racist, mother teresa, when does life begin bible
MY MESSAGE TO THE ELECTION OF GRACE
THE COMING 2012 COLLAPSE
HOW DID NOAH FIT ALL THE ANIMALS ON THE ARK?
This is one of the greatest mysteries of all the Bible, but I must preface the answer to this question by explaining what happened long before the flood. I’ve written in a few posts that there were other races there with Adam. Sure it says Adam was the first man, but it doesn’t mean he was alone. If five fingers touch the table at the same time, no one can argue that either finger wasn’t the first. Adam’s own name gives credence to my assertion. Adam in the Hebrew means “ruddy complected”. Why was God pointing out his skin color? God wasn’t only pointing out Adam’s skin color, but Eve’s as well. In Genesis 5:2, it says God named THEM Adam. If you then look at the rest of Genesis 5 at the generations listed, then you get to Noah to King David, then you look at Matthew 1 at the generations listed from David to Jesus, they were all Jewish. They were all of the ruddy complected race. Many things in the Old Testament are told simply from a Jewish perspective. Adam was not alone, but he was the first Jew. Eve is the mother of all living Jews. Nowhere does it say that God changed the skin of people. Some people believe that happened after Nimrod made the Tower of Babel and God divided the people and confounded the language then, but they assume too much thinking that it meant God also changed their skin. One of the other crimes Nimrod committed was that he tried to make everyone that existed the same. Now if everyone had the same skin color then, why would he try to make them all the same? God was offended because He wanted to preserve the race of the ruddy complected, because that was the race that would bare His Son.
It is from a point of view of the time that people must also take into account this story of the great flood. Noah was told to build this great ark by the Lord God. He was then told to gather not two of every animal, but two of every kind. This is very important. People assume it was two of every animal, but the only two animals that were listed was the raven and the dove. Two of every kind means that there were also two of every race that existed then that were also to be put on the ark. Before God divided the people, all races were in much closer proximity than they are now. Noah gathered two of every race, male and female to come on the ark to start over again. This is where it gets even more difficult to understand, but if you keep in mind the Jewish point of view of the time, you will have an easier time accepting my doctrine. The great flood wasn’t a worldwide flood. It was a great flood of that region of Earth. Now it says “earth” in the scripture, but that doesn’t mean planet Earth necessarily. It can and really must have meant “land”. They were not aware of other planets at the time, and the word “earth” really means dirt. They weren’t thinking of earth as a planet. It was just a word for “land”. It flooded the whole land, not Earth the planet. Noah was told to gather two of every kind in that region of the world. Every living thing in that region that wasn’t on the ark drowned. Again, one must keep in mind the OT being written from the Jewish point of view of that time.
Obviously this isn’t any kind of traditional doctrine, but really there are no other logical explanations. The great mysteries of the Bible that plague people often are either from mistranslations or the failure to dissect to the Nth degree what is written while assuming nothing. The mystery of the great flood isn’t anywhere near the only one that falls under that category.
For those that mock about the Jewish/Christian belief in the flood, I have given you a direction and an explanation. I would like some of my own from you, if you may. The legend of the flood is a worldwide one. As I’ve stated before in previous posts, the Chinese have their own legend of a great flood long ago and a ship that carried them to safety. The reason why they have this legend also is because they were there. Well, two of them were anyway. There is also scientific evidence of a great flood in that region of the world in the approximate time the Bible stated there was this flood. Also there are satellite photographs of something that is definitely wooden sticking out of the ice on Mount Ararat. Where did the Bible say the ark of Noah rested? Mount Ararat. While many around the world also have the legend of the flood, only the OT says precisely where it’s at.
How Noah was able to fit all of the animals on the ark was that he brought all of the animals of that region onto it. How they were peaceful to one another isn’t that big of a mystery. It is written in the next age that animals we see as being predator/prey will live peacefully with one another. God put this spell on them during their trip and probably for a time afterward so they can repopulate. Noah couldn’t have fit all of the animals that existed then onto the ark. That would have been impossible. Instead of ignoring that bit of information and sticking your head in the sand, perhaps you should try actually finding an answer to it. The world was a much bigger place back then. The world they knew was quite different than the world we know. The legend of Noah’s ark was told from their perspective. I believe strongly that near the end of this age, the ark of Noah will be revealed to the world. The mystery of God will be finished at the sounding of the seventh and last trump. Perhaps this is one of the shoes that drops. God bless.
Posted in Antichrist, Armageddon, bible, biblical scripture, Blogroll, Christian Philosophy, Christian Philosophy ; Antichrist ; Armageddon : End of, Christian philosophy Antichrist Armageddon End of Days, Christian Philosphy, christianity, election of grace, End of Age, End of Days, end of world, genesis, God's Elect, god's election, last days, latter days, revelation, sin, Uncategorized | Tags: adam ruddy complected, Chinese legend flood, God named them adam, God named them ruddy complected, mystery of God seventh trump, Nimrod tower babel, Noah's Ark, Old Testament written from Jewish perspective, other races with Adam Eve
DOES SATAN THE DEVIL EXIST?
Yes he does. I know a lot of unbelievers, so-called believers, and those who profess to be so educated love to nuance tiny bits of information that they come to know and act like they’ve solved an entire mystery, but they ultimately look foolish when the whole picture comes to focus. I’ve heard many on the net who think they know so much say that the Hebrew word “Satan” just means “opponent” and that’s that. Like there is only the definition and not the being. Their desire to prove that their disbelief is founded in the Bible itself keeps them blinded. There are a lot of names of actual people in the Bible that also have a definition. Just because the name has a definition, that doesn’t mean the being doesn’t exist. Jesus’ real name in the Hebrew was Yeshua (or Y’shua), which means “God saved”. There’s a definition and yet Jesus/Yeshua really existed. Even most “educated” atheists now admit that Jesus existed, which they used to put forth that he did not. The land of Israel has a definition from two Hebrew words. Put together, the words mean “God will prevail” or “He shall rule as God”. Mary’s real name “Maria” means “bitter” in Hebrew. My name Jesse in the original Hebrew is pronouned (yee-shah-ee), which means “God exists”. My name has a definition, but I’m also living and breathing. Satan does mean “opponent”, and yes he exists as an actual physical being. His name wasn’t always Satan.
Some will say his name used to be Lucifer, while again some who think they know so much will say the original Hebrew word there was “Helel”, which means “brightness” is all there is to the name. It’s only a definition about a former king of Babylon. I will prove this is nonsense later. It’s true that the original Hebrew word there in Isaiah 14:12 was Helel, which means “brightness”. It’s true that Isaiah was speaking about a king of Babylon, but was this a king of Babylon from the past? Long before God created us, and our souls are much older than our bodies, He created the angels. One of them was named Helel. He was the angel of light. The light bearer. He was also the morning star. Lucifer is the Latin translation of Helel. The Catholic Church translated the Hebrew Old Testament and the Greek New Testament into Latin with the Vulgate. The King James Version is the English version of the Vulgate. There was some wisdom with the Catholic Church translating the word Helel into Lucifer, because it says “Oh Helel/Lucifer, son of the morning…” Lucifer was also the Latin word for the morning star. Pretty good wisdom with the translation, even though I would have personally left it at Helel. Helel committed a great crime in the eyes of God, so God sentenced him to everlasting punishment. God decided to hold off that punishment because He needed Helel still. While the angels pledged their allegiance to Helel’s plot or God, our creation has not fully made that decision yet that God is satisfied with. Good thing for most of us. As I said, our souls are much older than our bodies. God is using Helel to weed out the unfaithful from the faithful in this age, and will again at the end of the next age as well. That is what Rev. 20 is about. The next age. The reason Helel is going along with God’s plan is because his hatred for our creation and the day we were created is unlike anything we have ever seen from man. Imagine the examples of hatred men have showed and think about how he must hate all of us. He wants to take as many of us down with him as he can. He knows there is no way out, so he’ll take his outrage on us since he cannot take it out on God. After God made His decision about what to do with Helel and our creation, He also changed his name to Satan. He used to be the angel of light and the morning star, now he’s the opponent/adversary, and has and will persecute our creation. In some cases in the OT, Satan can mean “persecute”.
Now to the king of Babylon part of this story. True there have been many kings of Babylon, but there will also be one more king of Babylon in the future. In Revelation it reveals that the future king of Babylon will be Satan. Isaiah was talking about the future king of Babylon and explained how he fell when he was an angel of God. It’s actually all pretty simple if you know the original definitions and not decide you know everything when you actually know little. Prophecies throughout the Bible are written in the past tense because those prophets were taken into the future to see those things. Those things they saw were the past to them, not to us. This causes a lot of confusion to even the most educated Christians of all denominations. Again, it’s pretty simple if you’re willing to not blind yourself and examine possibilities as to what certain things can mean.
Revelation 20:2 shows that Satan is a being that will one day be in the bottomless pit. This is probably the biggest prophecy of the future that people have interpreted that was sometime in the past. The bottomless pit was described as something that can be seen, and his stay was supposed to be for a millennium. There isn’t at this time any visible bottomless pit. This prophecy was written two thousand years ago, which means Satan must have been released a thousand years ago if they are correct. Obviously they are not. The bottomless pit will be opened when Satan and the fallen angels (the nephilim) are kicked down to Earth by Michael and his angels.
French poet Charles Pierre Baudelaire said “the greatest trick the Devil pulled off was convincing the world that he didn’t exist”. Great quote and almost true. The greatest trick Satan played has yet to be played. The greatest trick Satan will ever play will be to convince the world that he has their best interests at heart. That he’s a humanist. That he is our god. That will be the greatest trick the Devil will ever play.
Posted in Antichrist, Armageddon, bible, biblical scripture, Blogroll, Christian Philosophy, Christian Philosophy ; Antichrist ; Armageddon : End of, Christian philosophy Antichrist Armageddon End of Days, Christian Philosphy, christianity, election of grace, End of Age, End of Days, end of world, genesis, George Soros, God's Elect, god's election, last days, latter days, revelation, sin, Uncategorized | Tags: bible prophecies past tense, difference between satan lucifer, does devil exist, does satan exist, greatest trick devil pulled off, is satan real?, is the devil real?, Israel definition, Jesse name meaning, Jesus name meaning, Lucifer defintion, name meanings defintions Bible, satan bottomless pit, Satan definition, satan king babylon
WHAT I LOVE!!!
Posted in Antichrist, bible, biblical scripture, Blogroll, Christian Philosophy, Christian Philosophy ; Antichrist ; Armageddon : End of, Christian philosophy Antichrist Armageddon End of Days, Christian Philosphy, christianity, election of grace, End of Age, End of Days, end of world, God's Elect, god's election, last days, latter days, revelation, sin, Uncategorized
THE LOST, CORRUPTIBLE
Posted in Antichrist, Armageddon, bible, biblical scripture, Blogroll, Christian Philosophy, Christian Philosophy ; Antichrist ; Armageddon : End of, Christian philosophy Antichrist Armageddon End of Days, Christian Philosphy, christianity, election of grace, End of Age, End of Days, end of world, genesis, God's Elect, god's election, last days, latter days, revelation, sin, Uncategorized
