WHAT EXACTLY WAS THE SIN OF ONAN?

Millions of Christians and Jews throughout the centuries felt that the sin of Onan was the mere act of him spilling his seed and wasting it. This interpretation is not correct and I will prove it as much as I possibly can. In Genesis 38 it explains that two sons of Judah, Er and Onan were punished by God. For Er, it simply says that he was wicked in the sight of God, so God slew him. Er was married, but had no children, therefore not lot. Judah told Onan to take Er’s widow and marry her and to have children with her, but those children were to be Er’s lot, not Onan’s. Verse 9 says “And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in unto his brother’s wife, that he spilled it on the ground, lest that he should give seed to his brother.” So why did God’s word repeat itself within that verse? It already said that he knew the seed should not be his, so why repeat that at the end of the verse? The reason was God was making a point. God was telling us what Onan’s sin actually was. It wasn’t the act of spilling his seed. It was why he did it that was the sin. It then says this thing displeased the Lord so He slew Onan, too. It’s true it was the act that sealed his fate, but without the act there would be no sin. As Jesus asked the wicked scribes and Pharisees in the Gospels, who does the will of his father: the one who agrees to do the task but doesn’t or the one who refuses to do the task, but repents and does it? It’s like how it’s been said that Lucifer’s/Helel’s fall was because of pride. Pride alone does nothing. It’s what pride had him do that made Helel fall.

If nearly everyone is right and I am wrong, then God’s word clashes later on then. In Hebrews 13:4 it says “Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.” What this says is that whatever a man and a woman does in their bedroom is fine, as long as they’re married. If everyone is right and I am wrong, then Hebrews 13:4 would clash with their interpretation of the sin of Onan.

There are some things to consider though with what is right between a husband and wife. Obviously privacy is an issue, but there are other rules that even married couples must take into account. A woman cannot wear the clothes of a man, which means a woman can’t play the role of a man. That includes sexually. Men and women wore the same things back then, so one must realize this wasn’t a literal statement. Men also cannot be effeminate. Those two things must be abided by even married couples. Privacy is another issue. Putting videos on the internet or elsewhere would obviously be a sin.

Because humans are naturally squeemish when it comes to matters of sex, this helped with their misinterpretation. There are many more misinterpretations I will list in later posts, but this one plays with the consciences of many people. Just read Hebrews 13:4. That’s all you need.

Advertisements

2 comments on “WHAT EXACTLY WAS THE SIN OF ONAN?

  1. David says:

    So oral sex or basically anything long as other people or animals is Not invited in the bedroom a married couple can do anything? Does god honor a court house marriage as he would a couple getting married in a church? There’s still an open bible in a court house marriage. I know it may not be written but your thoughts please. Also I believe god and Jesus are the say person what do you think? Recently I thought about what happen at the Mt. of transfiguration when Jesus, Moses and Elijah wherein the spirit before 3 disciples if they are the same how were the disciples able to look at god in the spirit and live?

    • Jesse Norman says:

      Hebrews 13:4 is pretty clear. A marriage is a contract to which God acknowledges and expects the participants to uphold. The couple most definitely should pray, asking God to accept them as a married couple. Back in the old days, there weren’t preachers, priests, or rabbis available at every turn. Jesus and God are one, but not the same entity. This is pretty clearly written in different areas. God in His form would kill a man that looked upon Him. Even with the transfiguration, Jesus was in human flesh, but even seeing Him now it would not kill a man.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s