As some of you know, I have kidney issues. These issues have gotten worse over the last year. I have been on dialysis since last July. I need a transplant. I will give information to those of you who wish to volunteer. If it doesn’t help me, you can give a new lease on life to someone else. I found out I have the rarest tissue type, which means that I probably will have the longest wait time for a transplant. Anything, including prayers will be appreciated. Thank you.

Kristy Williams, RN,BSN,CCTC
Clinical Coordinator
Kidney Transplant
Indiana  University Health, University Hospital
Compassionate. Highly Skilled. Personalized. Visit iuhealth.org
—–Original Message—–
From: Kristen Williams <kwillia2@IUHealth.org> 
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 12:33 PM
To: Williams, Kristen M <

Associated Press willingly cooperated with the Nazis, new report shows

This shouldn’t be a shock. Despite the outrage today’s left has toward naziism, as well as labeling them “right-wing”, it was the elites of the day that shared in the ideas, and even pave the path for the Nazi party. George Bernard Shaw, Margaret Sanger, and the early 20th century progressives were the ones who pushed for eugenics and the talk of a master race. Sanger, a hero to the left, wanted blacks to be sterilized and have them have abortions until their numbers in America would be insignificant. She even spoke before the KKK. She was an elitist who spoke before the KKK. Who uses the KKK and Nazis to marginilize and insult their enemies? The elitist left. Shaw was the one who called on scientists to come up with a painless way to kill large groups of people, which was how the gas chambers came about. Shaw celebrated the fact that the Nazis and Soviets under Stalin were killing off people by the thousands, until he found out they were targeting Jews. He expressed his outrage by saying, “That is not what that’s for (eugenics).” Shaw only wanted the useless to die, which is why he put forth an idea to have people appear before a panel every five years and give just reason as to why they should be allowed to continue to live. If a person does not give adequate reason, according to Shaw, they should be killed off in a kindly manner. Other elitists of the day did target races also with eugenics, such as Sanger. Sanger is the founder of Planned Parenthood. It should not be lost on you that if there is a minority community, you can be sure to find a Planned Parenthood office there.

Scientists also pushed forth that eugenics was a necessity, and if you didn’t go along with such absurdity, you were a flat-earther. You would be considered too dumb to know what’s best for you and society. Sound familiar? Eugenics had scientists behind it. The media was also behind this message. There were some very racist articles published in the NY Times during that time, not The Daily Redneck in Fort Worth, Tx.

In 1939, there was a Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden in NYC. They didn’t have it in Kentucky, Oklahoma, or South Carolina. They had it in New York, where the elites were. International businesses, including American ones, profited by way of the Nazis. Some even profited directly from the theft and slavery of the Jewish people.

Who is for socialism? The elites. The word “Nazi” stood for “national socialism”. Who would call national socialism a right-wing cause today? No one. The evil, diabolical ideas put forth by the elites of the day were so repulsive, eventually the common people rejected them harshly, so the progressives decided to hide and call themselves liberals. One thing they definitely learned- make their enemies think they are their friends.

Associated Press willingly cooperated with the Nazis, new report shows. http://tiny.iavian.net/9mwb

Download Drudge Report(@drudgereportapp) from Google Play Store

Socialist or Fascist by Thomas Sowell

Great essay by Sowell. One thing he did leave out is how industries in bed with the government help bring about a cycle money, from campaign donations and other types of contributions (verbal support, etc), who in turn gets government money sucked up from taxpayers. This money literally goes in circles, all based on your money. This is something that needs to be addressed by conservatives.

Socialist or Fascist. http://tiny.iavian.net/9kin

Download Drudge Report(@drudgereportapp) from Google Play Store


This question is one of the most debated topics when it comes to religious artifacts there is. I won’t give details as to its known history. You can research that for yourselves. I will only bring up two points that are uncontestable that prove the Shroud of Turin was indeed Christ’s burial cloth. One, there are images in the shroud as well as pollen from a flower only found in Israel, which conclusively state the shroud originated in Israel. The flower is called the Zygophalum Dumosum. Despite historians bringing up for decades where they originally found, or refound as the case may be, the shroud, botanists now can conclude these floral imprints and pollen come only from Israel. Secondly, and most importantly, what caused the image? See, God clouds the judgment of believers and nonbelievers alike, so this question has escaped at least most of them. If man caused this image, wouldn’t we with our modern computerized scanners detect paint or something that made the image? The shroud is one of the most, if not the most scrutinized artifact out there, so what produced the image? The answer is something obvious and one not able to be accepted by many, yet they will never have an explanation.


While many so-called geniuses today basically claim that evolution is a proven fact, and even have many people of faith concede this, here are some questions that thoroughly disprove the theory of evolution. These questions will stand up to the scrutiny of any possible contention by elitist intellectuals. This will be short and sweet.

1. Why are there still dogs and cats? Why are there many species lower on the evolutionary scale still in existence? We’ve evolved from them, right? So why do they still exist? I can see maybe a couple of species just below us still hanging around, but there are still rodents around, if you simply stick with this class of species. If you include insects, there are well more than a million different types of insect alone.

2. Where are our ancestors between us and monkeys? I don’t see any. If we have evolved from them, but there are still many species of monkeys, then where are our ancestors? If some great environmental cataclysm happened that wiped them out, then again why are there still monkeys? Didn’t our ancestors evolve from monkeys? So weren’t they better equipped to deal with an environmental crisis than monkeys were?

3. How does a species decide that it needed eyes to see, then have the ability to grow them? How does any species decide it needed a certain bodypart and grow it?

4. Why would a species decide it didn’t need to fly anymore? Wouldn’t flying for a land animal be the ultimate ability to help for survival? So why would land animals get rid of that ability? Men have looked to fly for millennia and need machines to do so today, so why would a species higher up the evolutionary chart than birds get rid of the ability to fly?

5. When have we witnessed one species give birth to a different species? Of the millions of different species there are on earth, we have witnessed no species give life to a different species. We’ve been looking for almost two hundred years since Darwin, and we haven’t witnessed one change in species? A fire ant will only have fire ants and goldfish will only have goldfish. A robin will only have robins and humans will only have humans.

These questions can be elaborated with more examples and reasoning, but I’ll leave that up to you. Do not give in to scientists and the idea that if you oppose them that you aren’t intelligent. Don’t let this idea that pervades our society keep you from opposing things you know scientists are wrong about. Scientists are constantly wrong, and today’s scientists will be tomorrow’s fools. It has always been that way. Time is the great truth decipherer and time will reveal all things. Even God uses time.